China Automotive Injection Mold

”. Late last year, the squat, almost featureless Jibo graced the cover of Time Magazine’s “best inventions” edition.The key for Vector and other companion robots, experts say, is to strike the right balance between usefulness and personality.In late July, another startup, California-based Mayfield Robotics, ceased manufacturing Kuri, a roving 699 machine that would shoot pictures and video from cameras hidden behind its round, blinking eyes.Instead of cute, ElliQ aims for calm.“You cannot sell a robot for 800 or 1,000 that has capabilities of less than an Alexa,” said Boris Sofman, CEO of Anki, which plans to launch its pet-like Vector this fall.Fall short on personality, and “you better be perfect because the moment you make a mistake, you’re going to be the big lumbering robot that made a mistake,” Sofman said.Personal home robots that can socialize with people are starting to roll out of the laboratory and into our living rooms and kitchens.Jibo, a foot-high, vaguely conical device topped by a wide hemispherical “head,” stays where you put it, typically on a countertop. Such robots could remind seniors to take medicine, prompt them to get up and move or visit others and help them stay in better touch with extended family and friends. They scoot around on tank treads and chirp more than talk, household appliance injection mold but Vector can answer basic questions, set a timer or deliver mesغير مجاز مي باشدes from email and texts.Hopes for social robots keep outpacing reality.

It purrs when you rub its gold-plated back. They don’t much resemble their fictional predecessors; they mostly don’t walk, only sometimes roll and often lack limbs.“It’s a really cool device, but it didn’t offer a ton of utility,” Singh said. But people can forgive errors so long as the robot reacts in a realistic way.That hasn’t stopped ambitious robot-makers from launching life-like robots into the market — albeit with mixed results so far. The robot is expected to launch next year. Its creator, MIT robotics researcher Cynthia Breazeal, told The Associated Press at the time that “there’s going to be a time when everybody will just take the personal robot for granted. “Once people are convinced something is useful or actually saves them time, they’re really good at adapting.“We were looking for an aesthetic that will earn the right to be part of people’s life for a long period of time, not just a gadget or a toy,” said Dor Skuler, Intuition’s founder and CEO. (Affordability also seems pretty important. But it can swivel its flat, round screen “face” to meet your gaze; tells a joke and plays music, and can shimmy convincingly if you ask it to dance. Israeli startup Intuitions Robotics brought on prominent industrial designer Yves Behar to help craft the look of ElliQ, which is designed for seniors.Promising a robotic future beyond “puck-like vacuum cleaners and lifeless cylindrical talking speakers,” Anki is pitching the 249 Vector as an older brother to its tiny — and feisty — toy robot Cozmo. Other home robots, such as the three-foot, video-screen equipped personal assistant Temi (1,499) and Sony’s dog-like Aibo (1,800), are even less affordable. And they’re nowhere close to matching the language, social skills and physical dexterity of people. Since then, advances in artificial intelligence have propelled the field forward.Anki hired animators from Pixar and DreamWorks to give character to Cozmo and Vector.“Whether that’s by helping with loneliness, helping with tasks like cooking, that’s key,” he said.

Designed to sit on an end table, the robot is shaped like a rounded table lamp with a circular light shining from inside its translucent plastic head.) Though there’s plenty of diغير مجاز مي باشدreement over what makes the proper balance. It was pitched as “the world’s first social robot for the home.”That time has not yet arrived.Many researchers say social robots hold great promise in helping an ageing population. But they’ll be limited to very specific uses, he warned.Two pioneers in a new vanguard of cute, sociable robots — Jibo, a curvy talking speaker, and Kuri, a cartoonish wheeled “nanny” — have been early casualties. It’s still for sale online, but its parent company reportedly laid off much of its workforce in June and didn’t reply to requests for comment. The popularity of Alexa and its ilk has also helped take the strangeness out of talking machines.Both robots are tiny enough to fit in your palm.“I think we’re going to start seeing some come to market this year,” said Vic Singh, a founding general partner of Eniac Ventures, which has invested in several robotics startups. The makers of Vector, a less expensive home robot that was unveiled Wednesday, hope theirs will be a bigger hit.For the robots to catch on across all ages, though, they need to prove themselves useful and helpful, said James Young, a researcher at the University of Manitoba’s human-computer interaction lab. It can rest on a tabletop until it hears a door open or, using facial recognition, “sees” a familiar person in view.Still others, including a rumoured Amazon project and robots designed to provide companionship for senior citizens, remain in the development phase. It swivels frequently, directing attention to the person it’s speaking with and has an adjacent tablet screen to show off photos or text mesغير مجاز مي باشدes. But are humans ready to invite them into their lives?It’s taken decades of research to build robots even a fraction as sophisticated as those featured in popular science fiction.”At almost 900, though, Jibo didn’t win anywhere near enough friends.Worse, they’re so far losing out to immobile smart speakers made by Amazon, Apple and Google, which غير مجاز مي باشدt a fraction of what early social robots do, and which are powered by artificial-intelligence systems that leave many robots’ limited abilities in the dust.Social robots trace their lineage back to an interactive humanoid head named Kismet, which Breazeal built in an MIT lab in the 1990s

” that the word and its meaning Household Appliance Products Factory are as inseparable as Parvati from Parameswara, ( an indirect pointer to the fact that the dance is nothing sans its historical context) was briefly shown through elementary abhinaya, Justin himself making a very brief appearance. Quick vestiges of River Jamuna of old, inspiring the Ashtapadi lines from Jayadeva’s Gitagovindam “Dheera sameere Yamuna teere vasati vane vanamali”, the Padam “Maduranagarilo” in Anandabhairavi on the land of milk and honey and frolicking on the banks and Dikshitar’s “Nandagopala” in Yamuna Kalyani, changed to the grim poetry of lines from Milton’s Paradise Lost — a metaphor for what man has done to the Yamuna. And dancers Priya Srinivasan with her Kalakshetra background, along with Maitrika Rathore, Veena Kumar, Abhinaya Penneswaran and Karuna Singla — all well trained by Justin, rendered involved, yet subtle interpretation — the inspiring emotive backdrop provided by Sudha’s singing.“Where the Streets are fragrant with Sandal paste” in Bhaاين نام مجاز نمي باشدnatyam conceived by Justin McCarthy heading the Kendra Bhaاين نام مجاز نمي باشدnatyam faculty was one of the festival high points in creative imagination and aesthetics of presentation, built around the history of Bhaاين نام مجاز نمي باشدnatyam. The skeletal story line starts with a Sanskrit sloka on the gracious Varuna with his bounty of water, drenching the sandy coloured dry Earth, filling Prithvi with the beauty of life in various forms and greenery, and goes on to how the Oceans are sullied by the acts of treacherous, uncaring persons leading to death and pestilence. The dancers of this group meticulously trained in Yoga, South Indian classical forms, and the martial art techniques of Kerala like Kalaripayattu, have created a strong body language of powerful plie, and dance lines with full stretches. The ambience again changes and along with it the music in Tamil based on verses from the Silappadikaram “Tingalai Porrudum” set to Kambhoji, worshipping the early rising Sun (very suggestive) the picture in the Pallakki i now one of British royalty with accommodating dancers in British rule paying obeisance to the reigning authority: “O! Goddess Heavenly bright”, the English verses from Edmund Spencer’s “The Faerie Queen” has dancers paying salutations with the music in Kalyani with segments recited set to a ‘nottu swaram’ style of music which began during Muttuswamy Dikshitar’s time.

The scene was designed to evoke an informal and easy ambience with dancing girls interacting with a man in their midst, and lyrics being interpreted by individual dancers with others in the group looking on appreciating.What was laudable was the faithful capture of the flavours and ambience of Rajasthani culture — through the simple and aesthetic stage settings and the designing of the dance narrative, which without distracting from the story line included the typical dances of this region like Kalbelia, Ghoomar, Kachhi Ghodi, Teاين نام مجاز نمي باشدli etc. Produced some time ago, this venture was blessed with excellent foundational research by late Komal Kothari who provided script inputs with Keshav Kothari designing the simple but very effective sets. The music in Sopanam style of rendition has a haunting quality, though most of the background sound is based on a variety of percussion sounds in various tones — from Kerala — Chendra, Edekka, Timila, the Chengala, talam and even the copper drum of Koodiyattam — the Mizhavu. Disciplined group work is a feature of Samudra.Shriram Bharatiya Kala Kendra’s week-long festival at the Kamani to commemorate Dr Charat Ram’s Birth Centenary featured a vast canvas of group productions comprising old and new works of the Kendra and other invited groups — in free style, traditional and contemporary dance. The music in the background render’s Shankaracharya’s Ardhanariswar hymn in Sanskrit “Champeya Gauraanga”. (Very typical were the music soirees held in the home of well-heeled gentry, when Veenai Dhanammal, the famous grandmother of Balasaraswati, played her soul stirring music on the veena). The deity is replaced by a picture of the Raja, the main patron of the dancing women as the scene smoothly projects the Pallavi section of a varnam (quintessential high point of a devadasi’s performance addressing patron in mixed sensuous/spiritual tones) ) in Nattai “Sarasijanabha” rendered in two speeds of what is a traditional, rhythmically very challenging composition .“Movement and Stills” Kumudini Lakhia’s choreography presented by dancers of her institution Kadamb, along with male dancers from Delhi, starting with Aakar went on a Maharaja Bindadin Ashtapadi paying obeisance to the Gods, composed in taal Dhamar and set to music in Hindol by Madhup Mudgal. The Kumara Sambhavam couplet of Kalidasa “Vak arthaaviva sampruktau. The unease of the Mother at Meera’s insistence that Krishna visits her in her dreams: “Maji Mane Sopaname Barani Gopal”, Meera’s announcement to her just wed husband that Hari is her beloved “Ranaji Giridhar Preetam pyaro”, and Meera’s defiance in her final act of severing all family bonds: “Laaj gayi ghungatki, ab na rahoongi tori hatki” were all very tellingly enacted, the production never resorting to exaggeration, even in scenes of Meera being forced to drink poison and being left at the mercy of poisonous serpents — all touched upon fleetingly. And adding tremendously emotive melody power to the production is the music composed by Shubha Mudgal who also renders some of the songs meant for the female characters along with Radhika Chopra (the songs for male characters are sung by Manish Khullar and Hameed Khan).

The dichotomy and irony of a life born with a silver spoon yearning for sainthood, so starkly emphasised in Meera’s life, did not need the dramatic device of projecting two Meeras in the starting scenes, which aside from being an overstatement, was confusing. The tiger, the mythical bird, Nandi guarding the palanquin were all shown through stances and hand gestures. Kumudini’s main disciple Sanjukta Sinha, a Diva in every sense of the term, and more than a match for a male dancer, could, one feels, inject more of the soft touches into her dance, which almost intimidates in its prodigious mastery. Smarasundaranguni sari evvare in Paras ragam depicts the typical swadheenapatika, very confident in the assured love of her man who will not even look another woman, “Sakhi Prana” in Senjurutti ragam sees the nayika bemoaning the beloved’s switching his affections to another woman, and finally comes the jilted khandita nayika, berating the nayak who is the Lord of Tirupathi himself, for falling for the wiles of the other woman. One liked the male dancers (largely from Delhi) in a separate group performing to the taal with a quiet dignity. Justin, weighed down, dragging long strips of plastic water bottles strung together, told the story. The distinguishing aspects of the production lay in the dance narrative highlighting not just the poetry of Meera’s songs, given their very autobiographical tone, but the fact that this Krishna devotee born to the closeted, strait-jacketed, patriarchical Rajasthani aristocracy, thought nothing of throwing off the yoke and trappings of feudal comfort, to follow her heart and mind which had place only for Krishna. In the just rising Sun, early morning, with the raga along with it, the opening scene “How May I praise Thee?” had Umar Daraz’ ingeniously fashioned “pallaakku” (palanquin) balanced on bamboo poles carried in a procession parading the deity of the temple, the key patron of the dance with people and dancers paying homage.Madhu Gopinath and Vakkom Sajeev of Samudra Performing Arts, based in Kerala, and specialising in Contemporary Dance productions, in their Samudra-natanam - Jalam focussed on one of the cardinal issues confronting mankind- namely the dwindling sources of water, a vital necessity for life on earth. Most praiseworthy were the taut bodied, impeccably trained, balanced male and female dancers, moving with clarity of lines. The lead direction and choreography by Shobha Deepak Singh assisted by Raj Kumar Sharma, had the advantage of a captivating dancer in Molina Singh for the role of Meera. Kumudini Lakhia’s broad minded approach encouraging her dancers to challenge the energy of well trained bodies in a contemporary piece of work, choreographed by Santosh Nair with Bernard Schimplesberger’s music, while handsomely executed, made one wonder “Whither Kathak?”The writer is an eminent dance critic. Animated “Padhant” of original bols of Kathak mnemonics became a language of interaction by itself sans movement, evoking different emotive energies.

The other characters too were very supportive.. The strong feel for theatre that is the Kumudini style was obvious — with the full bodily extensions, not a whit compromised even at tremendous speed, with stage formations and patterns being constantly changed while interacting with space, with Dhamar taal in all its manly vigour. Credit to Justin McCarthy for creating a production visualising the dance in the pre-democratic avatars, when practised in its natural, non-proscenium setting . The concluding segment “On the banks of the Yamuna” through the contrast between what was and what is, concluded on a contemporary note.The Tarana set to Madhup Mudgal’s music in Kedar with no electronic instrument accompanying, lattice worked windows etched on the back curtain through lighting, saw dancers clad in white gliding like swans on the stage, dancing to technical names recited as padhant. Meera’s life represented woman’s fight for liberty and the right to make her own choices.The curtain went up with the Kendra’s nritya natika, Meera. While water is life, the dance also shows too much of it causing destruction. The lyrics selected were typical of the times, when great composer Dharmapuri Subbarayar, created Javalis for his love and muse Veenai Dhannammal. And one liked the rhythm, mostly in misram and at times in tisram all neatly brought out though movement, through footwork, through clapping. Contemporary dance devices with two bodies balancing each other, light footed lifts, and jumps — and floor tumbles getting into tangled situations and emerging out of them smoothly, are all part of the choreography. Without clutter, and simple in the sequential narration, right from the start, the desire to throw off all mortal bonds is emphasized like a refrain in the sadhu and his team of holy men singing and moving “Jagatme koi nahi tera”. Sudha Raghuraman’s soulful singing, given such a major role in creating the ambience goes to the credit of a musician/dancer like Justin who realises that dance is visual poetry inspired by the music. The dancer through history paid court to a variety of patrons. The evil character pitting its might against the beneficial forces, the veil- covered ghost like faces and bodies in a death dance (thanks to the polluted waters), and scenes where the swirls of yards of cloth held in the hand by the dancers creates patterns in the air adding to the geometry of the dance, was interesting. And the inventive music with words recited in a staccato rap fashion was most evocative..The second scene of the Dance, belonging to the ‘Sadir’ days (as the dance was called before being named Bhaاين نام مجاز نمي باشدnatyam) visualised an evening in the House of the Dancing Girls known for their expressional prowess.